Abstract
We argue that policymakers may have personal interests in policy restraints channeled through public oversight. Self-imposition of public oversight can be beneficial for the policymaker because it may help alleviate the dynamic inconsistency problem that she otherwise faces. In the setting studied herein, self-imposed public oversight takes the form of a ceiling on tax rates, which can be overridden only with the legislature’s consent. Such a mechanism is shown to credibly commit the policymaker to future tax restraint, thus inducing larger productive effort.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 95-109 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Public Choice |
Volume | 175 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |
Keywords
- Dynamic inconsistency
- Legislative oversight
- Tax caps
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics