TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensory substitution
T2 - Closing the gap between basic research and widespread practical visual rehabilitation
AU - Maidenbaum, Shachar
AU - Abboud, Sami
AU - Amedi, Amir
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a European Research Council grant to A.A. (grant number 310809 ), The Charitable Gatsby Foundation , The James S. McDonnell Foundation scholar award (to AA; grant number 220020284 ), The Israel Science Foundation (grant number ISF 1684/08 ), The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC) Vision center grant (to AA); SA was supported by a scholarship from the Israel Ministry of Science .
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) have come a long way since first developed for visual rehabilitation. They have produced exciting experimental results, and have furthered our understanding of the human brain. Unfortunately, they are still not used for practical visual rehabilitation, and are currently considered as reserved primarily for experiments in controlled settings.Over the past decade, our understanding of the neural mechanisms behind visual restoration has changed as a result of converging evidence, much of which was gathered with SSDs. This evidence suggests that the brain is more than a pure sensory-machine but rather is a highly flexible task-machine, i.e., brain regions can maintain or regain their function in vision even with input from other senses.This complements a recent set of more promising behavioral achievements using SSDs and new promising technologies and tools.All these changes strongly suggest that the time has come to revive the focus on practical visual rehabilitation with SSDs and we chart several key steps in this direction such as training protocols and self-train tools.
AB - Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) have come a long way since first developed for visual rehabilitation. They have produced exciting experimental results, and have furthered our understanding of the human brain. Unfortunately, they are still not used for practical visual rehabilitation, and are currently considered as reserved primarily for experiments in controlled settings.Over the past decade, our understanding of the neural mechanisms behind visual restoration has changed as a result of converging evidence, much of which was gathered with SSDs. This evidence suggests that the brain is more than a pure sensory-machine but rather is a highly flexible task-machine, i.e., brain regions can maintain or regain their function in vision even with input from other senses.This complements a recent set of more promising behavioral achievements using SSDs and new promising technologies and tools.All these changes strongly suggest that the time has come to revive the focus on practical visual rehabilitation with SSDs and we chart several key steps in this direction such as training protocols and self-train tools.
KW - Blind
KW - Sensory substitution (SSDs)
KW - Visual plasticity
KW - Visual rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898869639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.007
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24275274
AN - SCOPUS:84898869639
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 41
SP - 3
EP - 15
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
ER -