TY - GEN
T1 - Sherali-Adams integrality gaps matching the log-density threshold
AU - Chlamtác, Eden
AU - Manurangsi, Pasin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Aditya Bhaskara and Srivatsan Kumar.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - The log-density method is a powerful algorithmic framework which in recent years has given rise to the best-known approximations for a variety of problems, including Densest-κ-Subgraph and Small Set Bipartite Vertex Expansion. These approximations have been conjectured to be optimal based on various instantiations of a general conjecture: That it is hard to distinguish a fully random combinatorial structure from one which contains a similar planted sub-structure with the same "log-density". We bolster this conjecture by showing that in a random hypergraph with edge probability n-α, (log n) rounds of Sherali-Adams cannot rule out the existence of a κ-subhypergraph with edge density κ-α-o(1), for any k and α. This holds even when the bound on the objective function is lifted. This gives strong integrality gaps which exactly match the gap in the above distinguishing problems, as well as the best-known approximations, for Densest κ-Subgraph, Smallest p-Edge Subgraph, their hypergraph extensions, and Small Set Bipartite Vertex Expansion (or equivalently, Minimum p-Union). Previously, such integrality gaps were known only for Densest κ-Subgraph for one specific parameter setting.
AB - The log-density method is a powerful algorithmic framework which in recent years has given rise to the best-known approximations for a variety of problems, including Densest-κ-Subgraph and Small Set Bipartite Vertex Expansion. These approximations have been conjectured to be optimal based on various instantiations of a general conjecture: That it is hard to distinguish a fully random combinatorial structure from one which contains a similar planted sub-structure with the same "log-density". We bolster this conjecture by showing that in a random hypergraph with edge probability n-α, (log n) rounds of Sherali-Adams cannot rule out the existence of a κ-subhypergraph with edge density κ-α-o(1), for any k and α. This holds even when the bound on the objective function is lifted. This gives strong integrality gaps which exactly match the gap in the above distinguishing problems, as well as the best-known approximations, for Densest κ-Subgraph, Smallest p-Edge Subgraph, their hypergraph extensions, and Small Set Bipartite Vertex Expansion (or equivalently, Minimum p-Union). Previously, such integrality gaps were known only for Densest κ-Subgraph for one specific parameter setting.
KW - Approximation algorithms
KW - Densest κ-Subgraph
KW - Integrality gaps
KW - Lift-and-project
KW - Log-density
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052446554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2018.10
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2018.10
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85052446554
SN - 9783959770859
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques - 21st International Workshop, APPROX 2018, and 22nd International Workshop, RANDOM 2018
A2 - Blais, Eric
A2 - Rolim, Jose D. P.
A2 - Steurer, David
A2 - Jansen, Klaus
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 21st International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, APPROX 2018 and the 22nd International Workshop on Randomization and Computation, RANDOM 2018
Y2 - 20 August 2018 through 22 August 2018
ER -