TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-term drought response of N2O and CO2 emissions from mesic agricultural soils in the US Midwest
AU - Gelfand, Ilya
AU - Cui, Mengdi
AU - Tang, Jianwu
AU - Robertson, G. Philip
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank J. Bronson, K. Sun, and L. Tao for field assistance. We thank T. Zenone and others for thoughtful discussions and J. Schuette for helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript. We thank A. Kravchenko for help with statistical analyses. We thank Mrs. E. Marshall for access to CRP field sites. Financial support for this work was provided by the DOE Office of Science ( DE-FC02-07ER64494 ) and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ( DE-AC05-76RL01830 ), the US National Science Foundation LTER program ( DEB 1027253 ), and MSU AgBioResearch . J. Tang and M. Cui were supported additionally by NSF / DBI-959333 , Brown University seed funding , and the Brown University – Marine Biological Laboratory graduate program in Biological and Environmental Sciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Z.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Climate change is causing the intensification of both rainfall and droughts in temperate climatic zones, which will affect soil drying and rewetting cycles and associated processes such as soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. We investigated the effect of soil rewetting following a prolonged natural drought on soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in an agricultural field recently converted from 22 years in the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). We compared responses to those in a similarly managed field with no CRP history and to a CRP reference field. We additionally compared soil GHG emissions measured by static flux chambers with off-site laboratory analysis versus in situ analysis using a portable quantum cascade laser and infrared gas analyzer. Under growing season drought conditions, average soil N2O fluxes ranged between 0.2 and 0.8μgNm-2min-1 and were higher in former CRP soils and unaffected by nitrogen (N) fertilization. After 18 days of drought, a 50mm rewetting event increased N2O fluxes by 34 and 24 fold respectively in the former CRP and non-CRP soils. Average soil CO2 emissions during drought ranged from 1.1 to 3.1mgCm-2min-1 for the three systems. CO2 emissions increased ~2 fold after the rewetting and were higher from soils with higher C contents. Observations are consistent with the hypothesis that during drought soil N2O emissions are controlled by available C and following rewetting additionally influenced by N availability, whereas soil CO2 emissions are independent of short-term N availability. Finally, soil GHG emissions estimated by off-site and in situ methods were statistically identical.
AB - Climate change is causing the intensification of both rainfall and droughts in temperate climatic zones, which will affect soil drying and rewetting cycles and associated processes such as soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. We investigated the effect of soil rewetting following a prolonged natural drought on soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in an agricultural field recently converted from 22 years in the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). We compared responses to those in a similarly managed field with no CRP history and to a CRP reference field. We additionally compared soil GHG emissions measured by static flux chambers with off-site laboratory analysis versus in situ analysis using a portable quantum cascade laser and infrared gas analyzer. Under growing season drought conditions, average soil N2O fluxes ranged between 0.2 and 0.8μgNm-2min-1 and were higher in former CRP soils and unaffected by nitrogen (N) fertilization. After 18 days of drought, a 50mm rewetting event increased N2O fluxes by 34 and 24 fold respectively in the former CRP and non-CRP soils. Average soil CO2 emissions during drought ranged from 1.1 to 3.1mgCm-2min-1 for the three systems. CO2 emissions increased ~2 fold after the rewetting and were higher from soils with higher C contents. Observations are consistent with the hypothesis that during drought soil N2O emissions are controlled by available C and following rewetting additionally influenced by N availability, whereas soil CO2 emissions are independent of short-term N availability. Finally, soil GHG emissions estimated by off-site and in situ methods were statistically identical.
KW - Conservation reserve program
KW - Corn
KW - NO methodology
KW - No-till
KW - Soil carbon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937213289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84937213289
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 212
SP - 127
EP - 133
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
ER -