TY - JOUR
T1 - "Smart inhibition"
T2 - Electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching
AU - Meiran, Nachshon
AU - Hsieh, Shulan
AU - Chang, Chi Chih
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported by a Bi-National Taiwan-Israel research grant to Shulan Hsieh and Nachshon Meiran.
PY - 2011/9/1
Y1 - 2011/9/1
N2 - A major challenge for task switching is maintaining a balance between high task readiness and effectively ignoring irrelevant task rules. This calls for finely tuned inhibition that targets only the source of interference without adversely influencing other task-related representations. The authors show that irrelevant task rules generating response conflict are inhibited, causing their inefficient execution on the next trial (indicating the presence of competitor rule suppression[CRS];Meiran, Hsieh, & Dimov, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 992-1002, 2010). To determine whether CRS influences task rules, rather than target stimuli or responses, the authors focused on the processing of the task cue before the target stimulus was presented and before the response could be chosen. As was predicted, CRS was found in the event-related potentials in two time windows during task cue processing. It was also found in three time windows after target presentation. Source localization analyses suggest the involvement of the right dorsal prefrontal cortex in all five time windows.
AB - A major challenge for task switching is maintaining a balance between high task readiness and effectively ignoring irrelevant task rules. This calls for finely tuned inhibition that targets only the source of interference without adversely influencing other task-related representations. The authors show that irrelevant task rules generating response conflict are inhibited, causing their inefficient execution on the next trial (indicating the presence of competitor rule suppression[CRS];Meiran, Hsieh, & Dimov, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 992-1002, 2010). To determine whether CRS influences task rules, rather than target stimuli or responses, the authors focused on the processing of the task cue before the target stimulus was presented and before the response could be chosen. As was predicted, CRS was found in the event-related potentials in two time windows during task cue processing. It was also found in three time windows after target presentation. Source localization analyses suggest the involvement of the right dorsal prefrontal cortex in all five time windows.
KW - Cognitive control
KW - Conflict monitoring
KW - Event-related potentials
KW - Inhibition
KW - Reaction time
KW - Task switching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051638060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y
DO - 10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 21590505
AN - SCOPUS:80051638060
SN - 1530-7026
VL - 11
SP - 292
EP - 308
JO - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
JF - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
IS - 3
ER -