Software simulations of changing offsets and thus soft tissue tension when revising anatomic to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in convertible platform systems

Albert Ferrando, Luis Natera, Berta Buch, Paolo Consigliere, Juan Bruguera, Giuseppe Sforza, Ehud Atoun, Ofer Levy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Background: Revision shoulder arthroplasty may involve the need to remove a well-fixed humeral stem. To avoid this, convertible platform systems have been introduced. The biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) differs from anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The different humeral osteotomy and soft tissue tension may jeopardize the optimal results of the converted rTSA. The aim was to evaluate the radiographic parameters of soft tissue distraction when converting an aTSA to rTSA in a platform system and assess the capability of conversion without “over-stuffing” the shoulder in the “best-case scenario”. Methods: Radiographic analysis of soft tissue distraction parameters: difference in acromio-humeral distance, difference in lateral humeral offset and difference in latero-inferior displacement were evaluated in aTSA and in the converted rTSA in six different implants. Image analysing software was used on 10 non-deformed osteoarthritic shoulder X-rays to simulate conversion. Results: The greatest increase in arm length was found for Tornier Ascend Flex (26.8 ± 3.6 mm) while the smallest increase was observed with Lima SMR (19.3 ± 4 mm). The humerus remained most lateralized with the Zimmer Anatomical/Inverse (− 1.4 ± 2.9 mm) while Lima SMR (− 15.8 ± 2.7 mm) was more medialized. The greatest increase in latero-inferior distance was found in the onlay systems. A group analysis of onlay rTSA showed an increase of 46% in arm length (p < 0.0001), 83% larger humeral offset (p < 0.0001) and 144% increase in latero-inferior distraction (p < 0.0001) when compared to inlay rTSA. Conclusion: The conversion of aTSA to rTSA using a convertible platform system may lead to significant increase in radiographic parameters corresponding to soft tissue tension. This may alter the biomechanics, restrict the convertibility or jeopardize the optimal clinical outcome of rTSA even in the best-case scenario.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)611-619
    Number of pages9
    JournalEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 May 2021

    Keywords

    • Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    • Conversion platform system
    • Humeral offset
    • Inlay and onlay design
    • Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    • Revision shoulder arthroplasty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Software simulations of changing offsets and thus soft tissue tension when revising anatomic to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in convertible platform systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this