Sonographic fetal weight estimation - is there more to it than just fetal measurements?

Oshri Barel, Ron Maymon, Zvi Vaknin, Josef Tovbin, Noam Smorgick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different maternal, fetal, and examiner related factors on the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation (SFWE). Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzing 9064 SFWEs performed within 1week prior to delivery, including singleton pregnancies with a gestational age of 37 to 42weeks, was recorded at one medical center from January 2004 to September 2011. Predicted birth weights were calculated according to models by Sabbagha et al., Hadlock et al., and Combs et al. and were compared with the actual birth weight. Effects of different factors on SFWE accuracy were assessed. The systematic error, random error, and mean absolute percentage error were used as measures of accuracy. Results: High maternal weight, height, body mass index, multiparity, older maternal age, diabetes, and fetal male sex were associated with underestimation of SFWE (P<0.05). Fetal presentation and the sonographer's experience influenced SFWE differently using various models. The amniotic fluid index did have a significant effect on SFWE. Overall, more than 90% of the systematic errors were unaccounted for in the factors we assessed. Conclusions: Many maternal and fetal factors significantly influence the SFWE; nevertheless, most errors are probably due to inherent problems in SFWE formulas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sonographic fetal weight estimation - is there more to it than just fetal measurements?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this