Sore throat incidence with the laryngeal mask: A comparison with orotracheal intubation

Natan Weksler, L. Ovadia, A. Stav, G. Muati

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The incidence of sore throat was evaluated among 80 healthy (ASA 1 and 2) nonpremedicated adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for general, plastic, urologic, gynecologic, and orthopedic surgery. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: group one (n=39) consisted of patients in whom the airway was maintained by a laryngeal mask, and in group 2 (n=40), orotracheal intubation was performed. Both groups were similar in age, gender, site of surgery, and time of airway cannulation. Intraperitoneal surgery of the upper abdomen, and insertion of a nasogastric tube were exclusion criteria. The severity of sore throat was graded by the patients themselves using a visual analogue 100 mm scale, varying from 0 (no sore throat) to 10 (extremely sore). The sore throat incidence, severity and duration were significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group in comparison with the endotracheal intubation group.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)392-394
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Anesthesia
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Dec 1994

    Keywords

    • Anesthesia methdods
    • Complications
    • Laryngeal mask
    • Sore throat
    • Tracheal intubation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sore throat incidence with the laryngeal mask: A comparison with orotracheal intubation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this