Structure and Implementation of Novel Task Rules: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Study

Frederick Verbruggen, Rossy McLaren, Maayan Pereg, Nachshon Meiran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rule-based performance improves remarkably throughout childhood. The present study examined how children and adolescents structured tasks and implemented rules when novel task instructions were presented in a child-friendly version of a novel instruction-learning paradigm. Each miniblock started with the presentation of new stimulus-response mappings for a go task. Before this mapping could be implemented, subjects had to make responses in order to advance through screens during a preparatory (“next”) phase. Children (4–11 years old) and late adolescents (17–19 years old) responded more slowly during the next phase when the next response was incompatible with the instructed stimulus-response mapping. This instruction-based interference effect was more pronounced in young children than in older children. We argue that these findings are most consistent with age-related differences in rule structuring. We discuss the implications of our findings for theories of rule-based performance, instruction-based learning, and development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1113-1125
Number of pages13
JournalPsychological Science
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • cognitive development
  • intention-based reflexivity
  • interference
  • open data
  • rule implementation
  • task instructions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structure and Implementation of Novel Task Rules: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this