Submerged bed versus unsaturated flow reactor: A pressurized hydrogenotrophic denitrification reactor as a case study

Razi Epsztein, Michael Beliavski, Sheldon Tarre, Michal Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper compares the main features of a submerged bed reactor (SuBR) with bubbling and recirculation of gas to those of an unsaturated flow reactor (uSFR) with liquid recirculation. A novel pressurized closed-headspace hydrogenotrophic denitrification system characterized by safe and economic utilization of H2 gas was used for the comparison. Under similar conditions, denitrification rates were lower in the SuBR as a result of a lower effective biofilm surface area and overall gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient kLa. Similar values of effluent DOC were achieved for both reactors, although effluent suspended solids concentration of the SuBR were substantially higher. On the other hand, the required cleaning frequency in the SuBR was 2.5 times lower. Moreover, the SuBR is expected to reduce the recirculation energy consumption by 0.35 kWh/m3 treated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-156
Number of pages6
JournalChemosphere
Volume161
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Closed-headspace reactor
  • Gas recirculation
  • Hydrogenotrophic denitrification
  • Liquid recirculation
  • Submerged bed
  • Unsaturated flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • General Chemistry
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Submerged bed versus unsaturated flow reactor: A pressurized hydrogenotrophic denitrification reactor as a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this