Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel and membrane sweeping for cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty patients were randomized to either intracervical prostaglandin E 2 or membrane sweeping. A Bishop score was assigned by a blinded examiner prior to and 24 hours following the procedure. When both sweeping the membranes and prostaglandin placement are applicable, the beneficial effects are similar. RESULTS: The Bishop scores assigned 24 hours after prostaglandin instillation and membrane sweeping were not significantly different (3.4, SE 0.42, vs. 3.3, SE 0.37, respectively; P > .05). The proportions of women entering active labor or delivering within 24 hours were similar in the prostaglandin and membrane groups (21% and 19%, respectively; P > .05). CONCLUSION: When both intracervical prostaglandin insertion and membrane sweeping are feasible, their salutary effects are comparable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 706-708 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Reproductive Medicine |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| State | Published - 12 Sep 2001 |
Keywords
- Cervix
- Induced
- Labor
- Prostaglandin E
- Sweeping of membranes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sweeping of membranes vs. Intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for cervical ripening: Randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver