Ten simple rules for socially responsible science

Alon Zivony, Rasha Kardosh, Liadh Timmins, Niv Reggev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AU Guidelines: Pleaseconfirmthatallheadinglevelsarerepresentedcorrectly concerning the potentially harmful effects of scientific : studies have historically focused on ethical considerations for minimizing risk for participants. However, studies can also indirectly inflict harm on individuals and social groups through how they are designed, reported, and disseminated. As evidenced by recent criticisms and retractions of high-profile studies dealing with a wide variety of social issues, there is a scarcity of resources and guidance on how one can conduct research in a socially responsible manner. As such, even motivated researchers might publish work that has negative social impacts due to a lack of awareness. To address this, we propose 10 simple rules for researchers who wish to conduct socially responsible science. These rules, which cover major considerations throughout the life cycle of a study from inception to dissemination, are not aimed as a prescriptive list or a deterministic code of conduct. Rather, they are meant to help motivated scientists to reflect on their social responsibility as researchers and actively engage with the potential social impact of their research.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1010954
JournalPLoS Computational Biology
Volume19
Issue number3 March
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Modeling and Simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten simple rules for socially responsible science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this