Abstract
Tertiary-amine ligands are known to be poorer er donor ligands than the corresponding primary- or secondary-amine ligands. They are known to shift the redox potentials of given couples to the anodic direction relative to the corresponding complexes with primary- or secondary-amine ligands. A review of data in the literature and of recent results on nickel complexes with tetra-azamacrocyclic ligands and copper complexes with open chain polyamine ligands suggests that the major source for these effects is the poorer solvation of the complexes with the tertiary-amine complexes due to the lack of hydrogen bonding between the complexes and the solvent, or the counter ions. Thus the stabilisation of low valent transition metal complexes by tertiary-amine ligands is due to thermodynamic reasons. On the other hand, tertiary-aminemacrocyclic ligands stabilise high valent complexes because the route to the formation of imine groups is kinetically inhibited in these complexes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 275-279 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Supramolecular Chemistry |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 1996 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry