Testing the effect of serve order in tennis tiebreak

Danny Cohen-Zada, Alex Krumer, Offer Moshe Shapir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The order of actions in contests may generate different psychological effects which, in turn, may influence contestants’ probabilities to win. The Prouhet-Thue-Morse sequence in which the first ‘n’ moves is the exact mirror image of the next ‘n’ moves should theoretically terminate any advantage to any of the contestants in a sequential pair-wise contest. The tennis tiebreak sequence of serves is the closest to the Prouhet-Thue-Morse sequence that one can find in real tournament settings. In a tiebreak between two players, A and B, the order of the first two serves (AB) is a mirror image of the next two serves (BA), such that the sequence of the first four serves is ABBA. Then, this sequence is repeated until one player wins the tiebreak. This sequence has been used not only in tennis, but also recently in the US TV presidential debates. In this study we analyse 1701 men's and 920 women's tiebreak games from top-tier tournaments between the years 2012 to 2015. Using several different strategies to disentangle the effect of serving first from the effect of selection, we find that, for both genders, serving first does not have any significant effect on the winning probabilities of the two players. Thus, it might be useful for other sports, and contests in general, to consider adopting the ABBA sequence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-115
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume146
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Contest
  • Performance
  • Sequence
  • Tennis
  • Tiebreak

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the effect of serve order in tennis tiebreak'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this