TY - JOUR
T1 - The acquisition of a linguistic skill by adults
T2 - Procedural and declarative memory interact in the learning of an artificial morphological rule
AU - Ferman, Sara
AU - Olshtain, Elite
AU - Schechtman, Edna
AU - Karni, Avi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Israel Ministry of Education (Chief Scientist's Office) and a student stipend for S.F. from the Faculty of Education, The Hebrew University. The study constitutes part of S.F.'s doctoral dissertation at The Hebrew University.
PY - 2009/7/1
Y1 - 2009/7/1
N2 - How does practice make perfect in the acquisition of morphological skill in adults? Participants underwent intensive, multi-session training on an artificial morphological rule (AMR) requiring phonological transformations of verbs according to a semantic distinction. All participants learned to apply the AMR to repeated items, with a power law like improvement in speed and accuracy (group average), both within-sessions and between-sessions (consolidation phase) gains, and robust retention, as in non-linguistic skill learning. Generalization to new items evolved separately for different aspects of the AMR. Phonological aspects were generalized by all participants, independently of explicit (declarative) knowledge, and well fitted by a power function. However, the generalization of the semantic aspect required the explicit discovery of its requisite role, and was not universally attained; when attained, explicit knowledge of the semantic aspect of the AMR coincided with an abrupt increase in accuracy and initiated a phase of fluency gains (proceduralization). Our results suggest that both procedural and declarative memory contribute differentially to the learning of distinct aspects of a morphological rule, at different stages along the mastering of skilled linguistic performance.
AB - How does practice make perfect in the acquisition of morphological skill in adults? Participants underwent intensive, multi-session training on an artificial morphological rule (AMR) requiring phonological transformations of verbs according to a semantic distinction. All participants learned to apply the AMR to repeated items, with a power law like improvement in speed and accuracy (group average), both within-sessions and between-sessions (consolidation phase) gains, and robust retention, as in non-linguistic skill learning. Generalization to new items evolved separately for different aspects of the AMR. Phonological aspects were generalized by all participants, independently of explicit (declarative) knowledge, and well fitted by a power function. However, the generalization of the semantic aspect required the explicit discovery of its requisite role, and was not universally attained; when attained, explicit knowledge of the semantic aspect of the AMR coincided with an abrupt increase in accuracy and initiated a phase of fluency gains (proceduralization). Our results suggest that both procedural and declarative memory contribute differentially to the learning of distinct aspects of a morphological rule, at different stages along the mastering of skilled linguistic performance.
KW - Artificial language
KW - Declarative memory
KW - Generalization
KW - Memory consolidation
KW - Morphological rule
KW - Procedural memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349109118&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67349109118
SN - 0911-6044
VL - 22
SP - 384
EP - 412
JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics
JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics
IS - 4
ER -