The Association between Older Israelis' Quality of Relationships with Their Family and Migrant Live-in Caregivers and Their Loneliness

Esther Iecovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: (a) To assess the extent to which there are ambivalent dyadic relationships between older care recipients and their primary family caregivers (PFCs) and migrant care workers (MCWs) and (b) to examine the extent to which ambivalence explains loneliness among the care recipients. Method: A sample of 279 triads of respondents (care recipients, their PFCs, and their MCWs) was used and interviewed face-to-face. The Dyadic Relationship Scale was used to assess quality of relationships and ambivalence. The de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale was used to assess loneliness. Results: Mean scores for dyadic ambivalence between the care recipients and both types of caregivers were moderate. Lower levels of ambivalence in dyadic relationships with PFCs were associated with decreased loneliness. Ambivalent dyadic relationships explained 6% of the variance in loneliness. Discussion: Some degree of ambivalent relationship exists between care recipients and both types of caregivers. The vigor of ambivalence was significantly associated with the level of loneliness reported by functionally disabled older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)526-537
Number of pages12
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016

Keywords

  • Ambivalence
  • Dyadic relationships
  • Functionally disabled older adults
  • Loneliness
  • Migrant live-in care worker
  • Primary family caregiver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Association between Older Israelis' Quality of Relationships with Their Family and Migrant Live-in Caregivers and Their Loneliness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this