The case for orthopaedic medicine in Israel

Aharon S. Finestone, Simon Vulfsons, Charles Milgrom, Amnon Lahad, Shlomo Moshe, Gabriel Agar, Dan Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Background: Musculoskeletal complaints are probably the most frequent reasons for visiting a doctor. They comprise more than a quarter of the complaints to primary practitioners and are also the most common reason for referral to secondary or tertiary medicine. The clinicians most frequently consulted on musculoskeletal problems, and probably perceived to know most on the topic are orthopaedic surgeons. But in Israel, there is significant ambivalence with various aspects of the consultations provided by orthopaedic surgeons, both among the public and among various groups of clinicians, particularly family practitioners and physiotherapists.Methods: In order to understand this problem we integrate new data we have collected with previously published data. New data include the rates of visits to orthopaedic surgeons per annum in one of Israel's large non-profit HMO's, and the domains of the visits to an orthopaedic surgeon.Results: Orthopaedic surgeons are the third most frequently contracted secondary specialists in one of the Israeli HMO's. Between 2009 and 2012 there was a 1.7% increase in visits to orthopaedists per annum (P < 0.0001, after correction for population growth). Almost 80% of the domains of the problems presented to an orthopaedic surgeon were in fields orthopaedic surgeons have limited formal training.Discussion: While orthopaedic surgeons are clearly the authority on surgical problems of the musculoskeletal system, most musculoskeletal problems are not surgical, and the orthopaedic surgeon often lacks training in these areas which might be termed orthopaedic medicine. Furthermore, in Israel and in many other developed countries there is no accessible medical specialty that studies these problems, trains medical students in the subject and focuses on treating these problems. The neglect of this area which can be called the " Orthopaedic Medicine Lacuna" is responsible for inadequate treatment of non-surgical problems of the musculoskeletal system with immense financial implications. We present a preliminary probe into possible solutions which could be relevant to many developed countries.

Original languageEnglish
Article number42
JournalIsrael Journal of Health Policy Research
Issue number1
StatePublished - 18 Nov 2013


  • Musculoskeletal pain
  • Orthopaedic medicine
  • Pain management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'The case for orthopaedic medicine in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this