The Construction of Memory through Law and Law's Responsiveness to Children

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Society's unacknowledged conflict over its collective memory and the question of responsibility to the Other encourages the politicization of empathy towards children. What we fail to acknowledge is how dynamic and conflicting the process of remembering and othering is. This chapter describes how professionals who fail to reflect on this conflict can also neglect to respond to individual suffering. It argues that alienated doctrinal thinking, which cannot appreciate the value of face-to-face dialogue with the individual when constructing legal norms, in fact facilitates the rationalization of politicized empathy and abrogates our sense of injustice. Two partially overlapping issues illustrate this chapter's thesis: (1) the protection of family life for children from disadvantaged homes and (2) the public response to the past victimization of young offenders. The chapter first attempts to explain how doctrinal thinking may perpetuate alienation from the Other and illustrates how the law is an author of memory, tying this to the challenge of psychological-mindedness mainly presented in the last decade by the movement for Therapeutic Jurisprudence. It also explains how law can be more than a rationalization of selective remembering and subsequent politicized empathy, and how we can struggle more mindfully over the law's construction of collective memory.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCurrent Legal Issues
PublisherOxford University Press
Volume9
ISBN (Electronic)9780191695803
ISBN (Print)0199211396, 9780199211395
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Mar 2012

Keywords

  • Children
  • Collective memory
  • Doctrinal thinking
  • Empathy
  • Law
  • Memory
  • Therapeutic jurisprudence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Construction of Memory through Law and Law's Responsiveness to Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this