The Democratic Backsliding Debate and the Controversy over Regime Classification in Israel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using the 2023 controversy over Israel’s judicial overhaul as a case, this article analyzes the broader, decades-long debate about the nature of the Israeli regime. It demonstrates how conflicting assumptions about democracy and the Israeli regime underpin different interpretations of the proposed judicial overhaul. The 2023 debate contraposed majoritarian and liberal orientations, echoing previous understandings of Israel as either a liberal democracy or a diminished type of democracy like ethnic democracy. Despite their differences, both positions in this debate regard Israel as a democracy equivalent to other liberal democracies in the West and neglect the question of the regime’s borders and its implication for the regime’s classification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-82
Number of pages17
JournalIsrael studies review
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • democratic backsliding
  • ethnic democracy
  • Israel
  • judicial system
  • liberal democracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Democratic Backsliding Debate and the Controversy over Regime Classification in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this