Abstract
Patti Tamara Lenard assesses the justifications given for the right to revoke citizenship in democratic states and concludes that this practice is inconsistent with a commitment to democratic equality. She provides three normative reasons for the mismatch between democratic principles and revocation laws: that the practice of revocation discriminates between different citizens within each state; that it provides differential penalties for the same crime; and that it does not provide transparent justification or due process for this harsh punishment. Although I too am repulsed by this practice, I do not think it is necessarily undemocratic. Moreover, such analysis overlooks one legitimate motivation behind expatriation: the aim to regulate national allegiance. The new revocation initiatives act as a powerful symbolic tool in reinforcing a world order based on sovereign nation-states.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 261-264 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Ethics and International Affairs |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Political Science and International Relations