TY - JOUR
T1 - The Discursive Construction of Biometric Surveillance in the Israeli Press
T2 - Nationality, citizenship, and democracy
AU - Marciano, Avi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/5/19
Y1 - 2019/5/19
N2 - In 2017, following vigorous public debate, Israel established a centralized biometric database for storing its citizens’ bodily information. This step, according to privacy advocates, signifies a critical phase in the development of Israel as a surveillance society. This study examines coverage of Israel’s biometric project by three leading Israeli newspapers. Drawing on the intersection of media studies and surveillance studies, it employs discourse analysis to understand how the Israeli press constructs this project in various contexts, asking which narratives are promoted and how they coalesce into a consistent story about Israel’s surveillance agenda. The analysis points to two competing sub-discourses–legitimizing and delegitimizing–each of which positions Israel differently, either as a vulnerable victim of external enemies or as an abusive state violating its citizens’ rights. Surprisingly, Israeli coverage is more critical than supportive, offering a strong and challenging criticism of Israel’s surveillance. I suggest two explanations for the difference between the Israeli case and other accounts, which tend to be supportive, poor, and superficial.
AB - In 2017, following vigorous public debate, Israel established a centralized biometric database for storing its citizens’ bodily information. This step, according to privacy advocates, signifies a critical phase in the development of Israel as a surveillance society. This study examines coverage of Israel’s biometric project by three leading Israeli newspapers. Drawing on the intersection of media studies and surveillance studies, it employs discourse analysis to understand how the Israeli press constructs this project in various contexts, asking which narratives are promoted and how they coalesce into a consistent story about Israel’s surveillance agenda. The analysis points to two competing sub-discourses–legitimizing and delegitimizing–each of which positions Israel differently, either as a vulnerable victim of external enemies or as an abusive state violating its citizens’ rights. Surprisingly, Israeli coverage is more critical than supportive, offering a strong and challenging criticism of Israel’s surveillance. I suggest two explanations for the difference between the Israeli case and other accounts, which tend to be supportive, poor, and superficial.
KW - Biometrics
KW - Israel
KW - citizenship
KW - discourse analysis
KW - framing
KW - nationality
KW - surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046484219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1468723
DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1468723
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046484219
VL - 20
SP - 972
EP - 990
JO - Journalism Studies
JF - Journalism Studies
SN - 1461-670X
IS - 7
ER -