TY - JOUR
T1 - The ecosystem services framework in archaeology (and vice versa)
AU - Katz, Ofir
N1 - Funding Information:
Writing this manuscript was facilitated by the Israel Ministry of Science and Technology support of the Dead Sea and Arava Science Center. Constructive comments by the reviewers and editor have helped in improving the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Economics, ecology and archaeology study various aspects of resource utilisation and mobilisation, differing in the studied systems, objects and currencies. However, the three disciplines have developed mostly independently, resulting in limited dialogue among them. Emergent fields such as ecological economics and environmental archaeology are now linking the three disciplines and promoting dialogue among them, but a theoretical framework that links all three disciplines at once is missing. I propose that ecosystem services (ES) can serve as such a theoretical framework. Moreover, after an ES-centred framework establishes, it will be capable of further evolving – independently of ES—into a unified superdiscipline, relieving boundaries among disciplines. To demonstrate this potential, I present some examples of archaeology-ES linkages, relating to the past, present and future. I show, in general, how archaeology studies past ES and informs us on current ES, as well as how ES benefit archaeological practice. Thus, I demonstrate the strong interface between archaeology and ES, and how it can promote the dialogue among the three disciplines, provide them with new practical tools, and resolve theoretical issues as the sustainability of ancient societies and anthropocentricity and monetisation of ES. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
AB - Economics, ecology and archaeology study various aspects of resource utilisation and mobilisation, differing in the studied systems, objects and currencies. However, the three disciplines have developed mostly independently, resulting in limited dialogue among them. Emergent fields such as ecological economics and environmental archaeology are now linking the three disciplines and promoting dialogue among them, but a theoretical framework that links all three disciplines at once is missing. I propose that ecosystem services (ES) can serve as such a theoretical framework. Moreover, after an ES-centred framework establishes, it will be capable of further evolving – independently of ES—into a unified superdiscipline, relieving boundaries among disciplines. To demonstrate this potential, I present some examples of archaeology-ES linkages, relating to the past, present and future. I show, in general, how archaeology studies past ES and informs us on current ES, as well as how ES benefit archaeological practice. Thus, I demonstrate the strong interface between archaeology and ES, and how it can promote the dialogue among the three disciplines, provide them with new practical tools, and resolve theoretical issues as the sustainability of ancient societies and anthropocentricity and monetisation of ES. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
KW - archaeology
KW - ecology
KW - economics
KW - ecosystem services
KW - heritage landscapes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85138740500
U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10395
DO - 10.1002/pan3.10395
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138740500
SN - 2575-8314
VL - 4
SP - 1450
EP - 1460
JO - People and Nature
JF - People and Nature
IS - 6
ER -