The effect of Center High Mounted Stop Lamp (CHMSL) on rear-end accidents in Israel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of the use of Center High Mounted Stop Lamp (CHMSL) on rear-end accidents, as reflected in Israeli police records from calendar years 1991-2002. The basic analysis, similar to that used in previous CHMSL studies, compares the involvement in accidents of passenger cars of model years 1994-1996 that are equipped with CHMSL with passenger cars of model years 1991-1993 that are not equipped with CHMSL. The number of involvements as the struck vehicle in a rear-end accident was used as the relevant measurement and the number of involvements as the striking vehicle in a rear-end accident was used as the reference measurement. The results yielded an odds ratio of 0.93. The explanation that the CHMSL is responsible for the 7% decrease is intuitively appealing and is consistent with previous findings. However, the strength of this evidence is marginal (p = 0.07). Additional analyses evaluated the model year effect in greater detail, in order to determine whether there exists a change point between 1993 and 1994 as would be expected from a CHMSL effect, or whether the effect is spurious. Detailed analyses were performed on the ratio of struck to striking involvements as well as the rates of involvement of both types. These analyses showed that (1) the chosen reference measurement is an appropriate one, but (2) the 0.93 odds ratio is quite possibly due to other reasons unrelated to the CHMSL, thus further limiting the confidence in CHMSL effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-536
Number of pages6
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2005

Keywords

  • Comparison group
  • Exposure
  • Rear-end accidents
  • Road safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of Center High Mounted Stop Lamp (CHMSL) on rear-end accidents in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this