TY - JOUR
T1 - The Emergence and Global Spread of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
AU - Ravitsky, Vardit
AU - Roy, Marie Christine
AU - Haidar, Hazar
AU - Henneman, Lidewij
AU - Marshall, John
AU - Newson, Ainsley J.
AU - Ngan, Olivia M.Y.
AU - Nov-Klaiman, Tamar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by Annual Reviews.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Since its introduction in 2011, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has spread rapidly around the world. It carries numerous benefits but also raises challenges, often related to sociocultural, legal, and economic contexts. This article describes the implementation of NIPT in nine countries, each with its own unique characteristics: Australia, Canada, China and Hong Kong, India, Israel, Lebanon, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Themes covered for each country include the structure of the healthcare system, how NIPT is offered, counseling needs and resources, and cultural and legal context regarding disability and pregnancytermination. Some common issues emerge, including cost as a barrier to equitable access, the complexity of decision-making about public funding, and a shortage of appropriate resources that promote informed choice. Conversely, sociocultural values that underlie the use of NIPT vary greatly among countries. The issues described will become even more challenging as NIPT evolves from a second-tier to a first-tier screening test with expanded use.
AB - Since its introduction in 2011, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has spread rapidly around the world. It carries numerous benefits but also raises challenges, often related to sociocultural, legal, and economic contexts. This article describes the implementation of NIPT in nine countries, each with its own unique characteristics: Australia, Canada, China and Hong Kong, India, Israel, Lebanon, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Themes covered for each country include the structure of the healthcare system, how NIPT is offered, counseling needs and resources, and cultural and legal context regarding disability and pregnancytermination. Some common issues emerge, including cost as a barrier to equitable access, the complexity of decision-making about public funding, and a shortage of appropriate resources that promote informed choice. Conversely, sociocultural values that underlie the use of NIPT vary greatly among countries. The issues described will become even more challenging as NIPT evolves from a second-tier to a first-tier screening test with expanded use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113817205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015053
DO - 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015053
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33848430
AN - SCOPUS:85113817205
SN - 1527-8204
VL - 22
SP - 309
EP - 338
JO - Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
JF - Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
ER -