Abstract
The evaluation of citizenship has always been tied to ethical issues, as citizenship laws reflect existing rules and also define the desired 'good' citizen. In order to assess whether ethical considerations have affected the legal construction of citizenship in Israel, I compared the two main laws in Israel that regulate newcomers and their citizenship-the Law of Return (1950) and the Citizenship Law (1952). I examined the legal texts and used content analysis to address the subjective intentions of the legislators who proposed them, as presented in an explanatory memorandum. Many scholars have argued that these laws were introduced as the foundational laws of the Jewish state. Nevertheless, until the 1980s, the Citizenship Law was explained as a technical measure governing the citizenship of non-Jews. Although both laws are presented as ethical, politicians characterize them as mainly republican, concealing their liberal ethical component.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 79-98 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Israel Studies Review |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- Citizenship Law (1952)
- Civic ideals
- Explanatory memorandum
- Immigration
- Law of Return (1950)
- Naturalization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- History
- Sociology and Political Science