@article{844ceaa15ad343698ee639e4f3570755,
title = "The False Dichotomy Between Objective and Subjective Interpretations of Spinoza's Theory of Attributes",
author = "Noa Shein",
note = "Funding Information: 1I am very grateful to Alan Nelson for his guidance and assistance on this paper and the dissertation chapters upon which it is based. I am grateful as well to Michael Della Rocca for his generous help and comments. I would also like to thank Nicholas Jolley, Paul Hoffman and Amihud Gilead for their comments and observations. I would also like to acknowledge the support of The University of Haifa for its support through a post-doctoral fellowship. Finally, I am grateful to Miriam Shein for her much appreciated editorial suggestions. 2All the Spinoza references are from Spinoza, The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. I, translated by Edwin Curley, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985. I have used the following common abbreviations to refer to Spinoza{\textquoteright}s writings: E = Ethics, Ep = Correspondence (epistolae), TdIE = Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect. When referring to the Ethics I have used these common forms and abbreviations: ax. = axiom, Cor. = corollary, dem. = demonstration, P = proposition, Schol. = scholium, and so, {\textquoteleft}2P47,{\textquoteright} for example, refers to Part Two of the Ethics, Proposition 47. 3Haserot, {\textquoteleft}Spinoza{\textquoteright}s Definition of Attribute{\textquoteright}, in Studies in Spinoza, Critical and Interpretive Essays, 43–67.",
year = "2009",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09608780902986631",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "505--532",
journal = "British Journal for the History of Philosophy",
issn = "0960-8788",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",
}