Abstract
Credit attribution for journalists represents a crucial development in journalism, with numerous organizational, legal, political and literary implications. This article explores the rise of bylines and authorship in the French press during the last 250 years, as an alternative to the Anglo-American model, on which studies have focused. Findings show that bylines not only emerged much earlier in France but also represent different driving forces, functions and dynamics. While the Anglo-American rise of bylines reflected an occupational and organizational phenomenon, in which bylines were considered professional rewards, in the French case, the evolution of bylines was dependent on exogenous factors, mostly political forces that tried to discipline adversarial writers. Thus, in contrast with the quasi-linear progress of Anglo-American bylines, the French case is characterized by ebbs and flows, due to the continuous power struggle between the emerging journalistic field and the literary and political fields.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 407-426 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journalism |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- Authorship
- Bylines
- Credits
- Le Figaro
- Moral rights
- News reporting
- The New York Times
- The Times
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)