Abstract
This article investigates structural conditions for women's inclusion/exclusion in peace negotiations by focusing on the linkage between acts of gender stereotyping and cultural framing. Through a narrative analysis of semi-structured interviews with Israeli negotiators and administrators who participated in official negotiations during the Oslo peace process, I link two recent claims about how gender may affect negotiators' understandings of strategic exchange: the gendered devaluation effect and the gender-culture double bind hypothesis. Building upon postcolonial feminist critique, I argue that narratives about women and cultural difference (a) demonstrate and engage with Israeli essentialist and Orientalist discourses about Arab culture and masculinity; (b) manifest how ideas about strategic dialogue and negotiations are gendered; and (c) convey how policymakers and negotiators may use cultural claims to rationalize women's exclusion from diplomatic and strategic dialogue. Furthermore, the study implies that dominant framings of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations as a binary East-West encounter need to be replaced by a more nuanced conceptualization of cultural identity that captures contextual aspects of difference, including the existence of military power and masculine dominance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 373-390 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Security Dialogue |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Israeli-Arab conflict
- gender
- narratives
- peace negotiations
- postcolonial feminism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations