TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of religion on changes in end-of-life practices in European intensive care units
T2 - a comparative analysis over 16 years
AU - the ETHICUS II Study Group
AU - Schefold, Joerg C.
AU - Ruzzante, Livio
AU - Sprung, Charles L.
AU - Gruber, Anastasiia
AU - Soreide, Eldar
AU - Cosgrove, Joseph
AU - Mullick, Sudakshina
AU - Papathanakos, Georgios
AU - Koulouras, Vasilios
AU - Maia, Paulo Azevedo
AU - Ricou, Bara
AU - Posch, Martin
AU - Metnitz, Philipp
AU - Bülow, Hans Henrik
AU - Avidan, Alexander
AU - Sprung, C.
AU - Bernstein, R.
AU - Avidan, A.
AU - Sprung, Charles L.
AU - Anstey, Matthew
AU - Avidan, Alexander
AU - Azoulay, Elie
AU - Benbenishty, Julie
AU - Bin, Du
AU - Cook, Deborah
AU - Curtis, Randy
AU - Feldman, Charles
AU - Hartog, Christiane
AU - Joynt, Gavin
AU - Kainuma, Motoshi
AU - Levy, Mitchell
AU - Mani, R. K.
AU - Michalsen, Andrej
AU - Ricou, Bara
AU - Soares, Marcio
AU - Truog, Robert
AU - Ledoux, D.
AU - Ingels, C.
AU - Nalos, D.
AU - Gjedsted, J.
AU - Hartog, C.
AU - Zakynthinos, S.
AU - Mathas, C.
AU - Nakos, G.
AU - Koulouras, B.
AU - Miskolci, O.
AU - Sprung, C. L.
AU - Avidan, A.
AU - de la Guardia, V.
AU - Klein, M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Purpose: Religious beliefs affect end-of-life practices in intensive care units (ICUs). Changes over time in end-of-life practices were not investigated regarding religions. Methods: Twenty-two European ICUs (3 regions: Northern, Central, and Southern Europe) participated in both Ethicus-1 (years 1999–2000) and Ethicus-2 studies (years 2015–2016). Data of ICU patients who died or had limitations of life-sustaining therapy were analysed regarding changes in end-of-life practices and patient/physician religious affiliations. Frequencies, timing of decision-making, and religious affiliations of physicians/patients were compared using the same definitions. Results: In total, 4592 adult ICU patients (n = 2807 Ethicus-1, n = 1785 Ethicus-2) were analysed. In both studies, patient and physician religious affiliations were mostly Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Jewish, Protestant, or unknown. Treating physicians (but not patients) commonly reported no religious affiliation (18%). Distribution of end-of-life practices with respect to religion and geographical regions were comparable between the two studies. Withholding [n = 1143 (40.7%) Ethicus-1 and n = 892 (50%) Ethicus-2] and withdrawing [n = 695 (24.8%) Ethicus-1 and n = 692 (38.8%) Ethicus-2] were most commonly decided. No significant changes in end-of-life practices were observed for any religion over 16 years. The number of end-of-life discussions with patients/ families/ physicians increased, while mortality and time until first decision decreased. Conclusions: Changes in end-of-life practices observed over 16 years appear unrelated to religious affiliations of ICU patients or their treating physicians, but the effects of religiosity and/or culture could not be assessed. Shorter time until decision in the ICU and increased numbers of patient and family discussions may indicate increased awareness of the importance of end-of-life decision-making in the ICU.
AB - Purpose: Religious beliefs affect end-of-life practices in intensive care units (ICUs). Changes over time in end-of-life practices were not investigated regarding religions. Methods: Twenty-two European ICUs (3 regions: Northern, Central, and Southern Europe) participated in both Ethicus-1 (years 1999–2000) and Ethicus-2 studies (years 2015–2016). Data of ICU patients who died or had limitations of life-sustaining therapy were analysed regarding changes in end-of-life practices and patient/physician religious affiliations. Frequencies, timing of decision-making, and religious affiliations of physicians/patients were compared using the same definitions. Results: In total, 4592 adult ICU patients (n = 2807 Ethicus-1, n = 1785 Ethicus-2) were analysed. In both studies, patient and physician religious affiliations were mostly Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Jewish, Protestant, or unknown. Treating physicians (but not patients) commonly reported no religious affiliation (18%). Distribution of end-of-life practices with respect to religion and geographical regions were comparable between the two studies. Withholding [n = 1143 (40.7%) Ethicus-1 and n = 892 (50%) Ethicus-2] and withdrawing [n = 695 (24.8%) Ethicus-1 and n = 692 (38.8%) Ethicus-2] were most commonly decided. No significant changes in end-of-life practices were observed for any religion over 16 years. The number of end-of-life discussions with patients/ families/ physicians increased, while mortality and time until first decision decreased. Conclusions: Changes in end-of-life practices observed over 16 years appear unrelated to religious affiliations of ICU patients or their treating physicians, but the effects of religiosity and/or culture could not be assessed. Shorter time until decision in the ICU and increased numbers of patient and family discussions may indicate increased awareness of the importance of end-of-life decision-making in the ICU.
KW - Active shortening of the dying process
KW - End of life
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Religion
KW - Withdrawing life-sustaining treatments
KW - Withholding life-sustaining treatments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173978971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-023-07228-z
DO - 10.1007/s00134-023-07228-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 37812228
AN - SCOPUS:85173978971
SN - 0342-4642
VL - 49
SP - 1339
EP - 1348
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 11
ER -