TY - JOUR
T1 - The Israeli Surgical Oral Board Examination
T2 - Improved Objectivity Increases Knowledge Authenticity
AU - Pines, Guy
AU - Ben-Ishay, Ofir
AU - Hochstein, David
AU - Lahat, Guy
AU - Ohana, Gil
AU - Sebbag, Gilbert
AU - Kluger, Yoram
AU - Halvey, Ariel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Association of Surgeons of India.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - The oral board examination in general surgery in Israel was recently revised aiming for improved objectivity and standardization. Herein, we describe the current exam model. Between 05/2018 and 11/2020, two exams per year were conducted with the current exam model. The examination consists of 12 stations, each focusing on a different field. Passing score is 80%. At the end of the examination, examiners and candidates complete a questionnaire regarding the examination’s process and quality (scale 1–5). A total of 142 residents attended six oral board examinations. Mean pass rate was 76.6 ± 9.5%. Questions with overall highest pass rates were acute-care surgery (86.6 ± 4.8%), foregut surgery (84.6 ± 7.6%), and colorectal surgery (84 ± 8.1%). Questions with the highest fail rates were surgical oncology (31.7 ± 13.3%) and abdominal-wall surgery (28.8 ± 16.9%). Examiners’ feedback scored highest the following: standardization of the exam (4.45 ± 0.63) and whether the presented cases reflect the daily work of an attending surgeon (4.35 ± 0.87). Candidates’ feedback scored highest the following: did the examiners treat you in an appropriate manner (4.08 ± 1.17). In conclusion, oral exams are challenging and bear limitations, but properly constructed exams allow good evaluation of the trainees’ thinking process and decision-making skills, without compromising exam’s integrity and standardization.
AB - The oral board examination in general surgery in Israel was recently revised aiming for improved objectivity and standardization. Herein, we describe the current exam model. Between 05/2018 and 11/2020, two exams per year were conducted with the current exam model. The examination consists of 12 stations, each focusing on a different field. Passing score is 80%. At the end of the examination, examiners and candidates complete a questionnaire regarding the examination’s process and quality (scale 1–5). A total of 142 residents attended six oral board examinations. Mean pass rate was 76.6 ± 9.5%. Questions with overall highest pass rates were acute-care surgery (86.6 ± 4.8%), foregut surgery (84.6 ± 7.6%), and colorectal surgery (84 ± 8.1%). Questions with the highest fail rates were surgical oncology (31.7 ± 13.3%) and abdominal-wall surgery (28.8 ± 16.9%). Examiners’ feedback scored highest the following: standardization of the exam (4.45 ± 0.63) and whether the presented cases reflect the daily work of an attending surgeon (4.35 ± 0.87). Candidates’ feedback scored highest the following: did the examiners treat you in an appropriate manner (4.08 ± 1.17). In conclusion, oral exams are challenging and bear limitations, but properly constructed exams allow good evaluation of the trainees’ thinking process and decision-making skills, without compromising exam’s integrity and standardization.
KW - Objectivity
KW - Oral board examination
KW - Standardization
KW - Trainee evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128069782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12262-022-03408-1
DO - 10.1007/s12262-022-03408-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128069782
SN - 0972-2068
VL - 84
SP - 269
EP - 274
JO - Indian Journal of Surgery
JF - Indian Journal of Surgery
ER -