The kinetics of peak 5 in LiF:Mg,Ti - Dose dependence of the thermoluminescence isothermal decay at 165°C

D. Satinger, L. Oster, Y. S. Horowitz, D. Yossian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The question of the order of kinetics of the thermoluminescence (TL) of peak 5 in LiF:Mg,Ti has been subject to considerable controversy. Recently, we have shown that peak shape analysis of post-irradiation annealed LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) at 165°C leads to non-first-order kinetics, reaching a value as high as 1.72 ± 0.07 following a 165°C 30 min post-irradiation anneal. When no post-irradiation anneal is applied, peak shape analysis almost always yields first-order behaviour. Isothermal decay data are equally ambiguous. To begin to resolve this discrepancy (at least at the experimental level) we have studied the isothermal decay of peak 5 at 165°C (presumably cleansed of the low-temperature peaks 2-4 by a 165°C 15 min post-irradiation anneal). The isothermal decay was initiated at four dose levels of 10, 100, 300 and 1000 Gy, and these decays were not even vaguely similar. The initial rate of decay at 103 Gy was at least five times greater than at 10 Gy and the decays were clearly non-exponential. Our data are not consistent with first-order decay (b = 1) and lead to b = 1.82 ± 0.18 using general-order (GO) model analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)900-911
Number of pages12
JournalJournal Physics D: Applied Physics
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Mar 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The kinetics of peak 5 in LiF:Mg,Ti - Dose dependence of the thermoluminescence isothermal decay at 165°C'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this