Conditioned responding extinguishes more slowly after partial (inconsistent) reinforcement than after consistent reinforcement. This Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect (PREE) is usually attributed to learning about nonreinforcement during the partial schedule. An alternative explanation attributes it to any difference in the rate of reinforcement, arguing that animals can detect the change to nonreinforcement more quickly after a denser schedule than a leaner schedule. Experiments 1a and 1b compared extinction of magazine responding to a conditioned stimulus (CS) reinforced with 1 food pellet per trial and a CS reinforced with 2 pellets per trial. Despite the difference in reinforcement rate, there was no reliable difference in extinction. Both experiments did demonstrate the conventional PREE comparing a partial CS (50% reinforced) with a consistent CS. Experiments 2 and 3 tested whether the PREE depends specifically on learning about nonreinforced trials during partial reinforcement. Rats were trained with 2 CS configurations, A and AX. One was partially reinforced, the other consistently reinforced. When AX was partial and A consistent, responding to AX extinguished more slowly than to A. When AX was consistent and A was partial, there was no difference in their extinction. Therefore, pairing X with partial reinforcement allowed rats to show a PREE to AX that did not generalize to A. Pairing A with partial reinforcement meant that rats showed a PREE to A that generalized to AX. Thus, the PREE depends on learning about nonreinforced trials during partial reinforcement and is not because of any difference in per-trial probability of reinforcement.
|Journal||Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition|
|State||Published - 1 Jan 2019|
- Pavlovian conditioning
- Rate estimation theory
- Reinforcement schedules
- Sequential theory