The post-evaluation of an engineering project via AHP

Zilla Sinuany-Stern, Atzmon Amitai

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors discuss the post-evaluation of a large engineering project in Beer-Sheva, Israel, in which a new production line was constructed using new technology to produce a new cleaning detergent. In this post-evaluation, half of the evaluators graded the project as a success, while the other half as a failure. But after using the analytical hierarchy (AHP), considering several attributes, the overall grade of each evaluator was high. The six attributes used were: meeting the schedule, meeting the budget, how closely the original design was followed, performance quality, level of design, and the level of maintenance and accessibility of parts.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication91 Portland Int Conf Manage Eng Technol
PublisherPubl by IEEE
Pages275-277
Number of pages3
ISBN (Print)0780301617
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1992
EventProceedings of the 1991 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology - PICMET '91 - Portland, OR, USA
Duration: 27 Oct 199131 Oct 1991

Publication series

Name91 Portland Int Conf Manage Eng Technol

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 1991 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology - PICMET '91
CityPortland, OR, USA
Period27/10/9131/10/91

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The post-evaluation of an engineering project via AHP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this