The presence of automation enhances deontological considerations in moral judgments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The rapid deployment of semi-autonomous systems (i.e., systems requiring human monitoring such as Uber AVs) poses ethical challenges when these systems face morally-laden situations. We ask how people evaluate morally-laden decisions of humans who monitor these systems in situations of unavoidable harm. We conducted three pre-registered experiments (total N = 1811), using modified trolley moral dilemma scenarios. Our findings suggest that people apply different criteria when judging morality and deserved punishment of regular-car versus AV drivers. Regular-car drivers are judged according to a consequentialist minimizing harm criterion, whereas AV drivers are judged according to whether or not they took action, with a more favorable prior for acting. Integrating judgment and decision-making research with moral psychology, the current research illuminates how the presence versus absence of automation affects moral judgments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107590
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume140
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Psychology (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The presence of automation enhances deontological considerations in moral judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this