TY - JOUR
T1 - The SCARE Statement
T2 - Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines
AU - SCARE Group
AU - Agha, Riaz A.
AU - Fowler, Alexander J.
AU - Saeta, Alexandra
AU - Barai, Ishani
AU - Rajmohan, Shivanchan
AU - Orgill, Dennis P.
AU - Afifi, Raafat
AU - Al-Ahmadi, Raha
AU - Albrecht, Joerg
AU - Alsawadi, Abdulrahman
AU - Aronson, Jeffrey
AU - Hammad Ather, M.
AU - Bashashati, Mohammad
AU - Basu, Somprakas
AU - Bradley, Patrick
AU - Chalkoo, Mushtaq
AU - Challacombe, Ben
AU - Cross, Trent
AU - Derbyshire, Laura
AU - Farooq, Naheed
AU - Hoffman, Jerome
AU - Kadioglu, Huseyin
AU - Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
AU - Kirshtein, Boris
AU - Klappenbach, Roberto
AU - Laskin, Daniel
AU - Miguel, Diana
AU - Milburn, James
AU - Reza Mousavi, Seyed
AU - Muensterer, Oliver
AU - Ngu, James
AU - Nixon, Iain
AU - Noureldin, Ashraf
AU - Perakath, Benjamin
AU - Raison, Nicholas
AU - Raveendran, Kandiah
AU - Sullivan, Timothy
AU - Thoma, Achilleas
AU - Thorat, Mangesh
AU - Valmasoni, Michele
AU - Massarut, Samuele
AU - D'cruz, Anil
AU - Vasudevan, Baskaran
AU - Giordano, Salvatore
AU - Roy, Gaurav
AU - Healy, Donagh
AU - Machado-Aranda, David
AU - Carroll, Bryan
AU - Rosin, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Introduction Case reports have been a long held tradition within the surgical literature. Reporting guidelines can improve transparency and reporting quality. However, recent consensus-based guidelines for case reports (CARE) are not surgically focused. Our objective was to develop surgical case report guidelines. Methods The CARE statement was used as the basis for a Delphi consensus. The Delphi questionnaire was administered via Google Forms and conducted using standard Delphi methodology. A multidisciplinary group of surgeons and others with expertise in the reporting of case reports were invited to participate. In round one, participants stated how each item of the CARE statement should be changed and what additional items were needed. Revised and additional items from round one were put forward into a further round, where participants voted on the extent of their agreement with each item, using a nine-point Likert scale, as proposed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) working group. Results In round one, there was a 64% (38/59) response rate. Following adjustment of the guideline with the incorporation of recommended changes, round two commenced and there was an 83% (49/59) response rate. All but one of the items were approved by the participants, with Likert scores 7–9 awarded by >70% of respondents. The final guideline consists of a 14-item checklist. Conclusion We present the SCARE Guideline, consisting of a 14-item checklist that will improve the reporting quality of surgical case reports.
AB - Introduction Case reports have been a long held tradition within the surgical literature. Reporting guidelines can improve transparency and reporting quality. However, recent consensus-based guidelines for case reports (CARE) are not surgically focused. Our objective was to develop surgical case report guidelines. Methods The CARE statement was used as the basis for a Delphi consensus. The Delphi questionnaire was administered via Google Forms and conducted using standard Delphi methodology. A multidisciplinary group of surgeons and others with expertise in the reporting of case reports were invited to participate. In round one, participants stated how each item of the CARE statement should be changed and what additional items were needed. Revised and additional items from round one were put forward into a further round, where participants voted on the extent of their agreement with each item, using a nine-point Likert scale, as proposed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) working group. Results In round one, there was a 64% (38/59) response rate. Following adjustment of the guideline with the incorporation of recommended changes, round two commenced and there was an 83% (49/59) response rate. All but one of the items were approved by the participants, with Likert scores 7–9 awarded by >70% of respondents. The final guideline consists of a 14-item checklist. Conclusion We present the SCARE Guideline, consisting of a 14-item checklist that will improve the reporting quality of surgical case reports.
KW - CARE
KW - Case report
KW - Guideline
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991690890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 27613565
AN - SCOPUS:84991690890
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 34
SP - 180
EP - 186
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
ER -