The ultrasound score and fetal heart-rate pattern as predictor of fetal outcome

M. Mazor, J. R. Leiberman, Z. J. Hagay, V. Insler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Over a period of one year 312 high-risk patients (HRP) were prospectively monitored using ultrasound score (USS), nonstress test (NST) and contraction stress test (CST). There were nine cases with low USS, seven of them had reactive NSTs, were delivered vaginally without any evidence of distress in labour and had normal Apgar scores with no perinatal morbidity. In the remaining two cases the NST was nonreactive and they were delivered by cesarean section because of fetal distress. The NST was not reactive in 18 patients, eight of them subsequently had abnormal CST and displayed fetal distress during labour. The USS was high in 16 cases. The results of this study seems to indicate that in cases with nonreactive NST, CST is a better predictor of fetal outcome than the ultrasound score.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-11
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1985
Externally publishedYes


  • contraction stress test
  • nonstress test
  • ultrasound score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'The ultrasound score and fetal heart-rate pattern as predictor of fetal outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this