TY - JOUR
T1 - Therapeutic Computed Tomography-Guided Pericardiocentesis
T2 - Lessons Learned Based on a 7-Year Single-Center Experience
AU - Khashper, Alla
AU - Shelef, Ilan
AU - Taragin, Benjamin Hyatt
AU - Smolikov, Alexander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Objective Pericardiocentesis is a well-known procedure commonly performed by either image-guided intervention or surgical approaches. Computed tomography (CT)-guided pericardiocentesis is not widely used, but provides certain advantages. In the article we will discuss our technique of CT-guided therapeutic pericardiocentesis, including advantages and disadvantages, patient selection, possible approaches, and complications. Methods The retrospective study included 121 therapeutic pericardial drainages performed under CT guidance. Demographic data of the patients, entry site, and needle orientation were recorded. Procedure complications and their significance were analyzed. Results One hundred and twenty-one pericardial drainages with catheter insertion were performed under CT guidance on 119 patients presenting with clinically significant pericardial effusion. The most common approach was at the left anterior chest wall. The rate of minor complications was 5.8%, no major complications occurred. Conclusions Therapeutic pericardiocentesis can be obtained under CT guidance in a safe and effective manner. Recommendations for building a patient-centered protocol with an interdisciplinary team are discussed. Patient selection, procedural guidance, and lessons to avoid complications are reviewed.
AB - Objective Pericardiocentesis is a well-known procedure commonly performed by either image-guided intervention or surgical approaches. Computed tomography (CT)-guided pericardiocentesis is not widely used, but provides certain advantages. In the article we will discuss our technique of CT-guided therapeutic pericardiocentesis, including advantages and disadvantages, patient selection, possible approaches, and complications. Methods The retrospective study included 121 therapeutic pericardial drainages performed under CT guidance. Demographic data of the patients, entry site, and needle orientation were recorded. Procedure complications and their significance were analyzed. Results One hundred and twenty-one pericardial drainages with catheter insertion were performed under CT guidance on 119 patients presenting with clinically significant pericardial effusion. The most common approach was at the left anterior chest wall. The rate of minor complications was 5.8%, no major complications occurred. Conclusions Therapeutic pericardiocentesis can be obtained under CT guidance in a safe and effective manner. Recommendations for building a patient-centered protocol with an interdisciplinary team are discussed. Patient selection, procedural guidance, and lessons to avoid complications are reviewed.
KW - CT-guided
KW - pericardiocentesis
KW - procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111262289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001190
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001190
M3 - Article
C2 - 34270484
AN - SCOPUS:85111262289
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 45
SP - 643
EP - 648
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 4
ER -