There is always time for rational skepticism: Reply to Hall etal

Amir Shani, Boaz Arad

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

8 Scopus citations


In this response to Hall etal., we addressed the various criticisms raised in their rejoinder about the validity of our arguments for climate-change skepticism. The so-called consensus on anthropogenic climate change is challenged, and doubts are casted regarding the credibility and accurateness of the IPCC reports. This response continues to demonstrate the serious drawbacks of current climate-change assessments, as well as to provide evidence undermining the alarmist assessments of climate-change impacts. Overall, the current state of knowledge supports our call for a skeptical approach in studies on climate change and tourism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-351
Number of pages4
JournalTourism Management
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Transportation
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
  • Strategy and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'There is always time for rational skepticism: Reply to Hall etal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this