Theregulation of cognitive enhancement devices: Extending the medical model

Hannah Maslen, Thomas Douglas, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Neil Levy, Julian Savulescu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents a model for regulating cognitive enhancement devices (CEDs). Recently, it has become very easy for individuals to purchase devices which directly modulate brain function. For example, transcranial direct current stimulators are increasingly being produced and marketed online as devices for cognitive enhancement.Despite posing risks in a similar way to medical devices, devices that do not make any therapeutic claims do not have to meet anything more than basic product safety standards.We present the case for extending existing medical device legislation to cover CEDs. Medical devices and CEDs operate by the same or similar mechanisms and pose the same or similar risks. This fact coupled with the arbitrariness of the line between treatment and enhancement count in favour of regulating these devices in the same way. In arguing for this regulatory model, the paper highlights potential challenges to its implementation, and suggests solutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-93
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Law and the Biosciences
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive enhancement devices
  • Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency: medical devices
  • Regulation
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theregulation of cognitive enhancement devices: Extending the medical model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this