Tight Kernel bounds for problems on graphs with small degeneracy

Marek Cygan, Fabrizio Grandoni, Danny Hermelin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Kernelization is a strong and widely applied technique in parameterized complexity. In a nutshell, a kernelization algorithm for a parameterized problem transforms in polynomial time a given instance of the problem into an equivalent instance whose size depends solely on the parameter. Recent years have seen major advances in the study of both upper and lower bound techniques for kernelization, and by now this area has become one of the major research threads in parameterized complexity. In this article, we consider kernelization for problems on d-degenerate graphs, that is, graphs such that any subgraph contains a vertex of degree at most d. This graph class generalizes many classes of graphs for which effective kernelization is known to exist, for example, planar graphs, H-minor free graphs, and H-topological-minor free graphs. We show that for several natural problems on d-degenerate graphs the best-known kernelization upper bounds are essentially tight. In particular, using intricate constructions of weak compositions, we prove that unless coNP ⊆ NP/poly: • DOMINATING SET has no kernels of size O(k(d-1)(d-3)-ϵ) for any ϵ > 0. The current best upper bound is O(k(d+1)2). • INDEPENDENT DOMINATING SET has no kernels of size O(kd-4-ϵ) for any ϵ > 0. The current best upper bound is O(kd+1). • INDUCED MATCHING has no kernels of size O(kd-3-ϵ) for any ϵ > 0. The current best upper bound is O(kd). To the best of our knowledge, DOMINATING SET is the the first problem where a lower bound with superlinear dependence on d (in the exponent) can be proved. In the last section of the article, we also give simple kernels for CONNECTED VERTEX COVER and CAPACITATED VERTEX COVER of size O(kd) and O(kd+1), respectively. We show that the latter problem has no kernels of size O(kd-ϵ) unless coNP ⊆ NP/poly by a simple reduction from d-EXACT SET COVER (the same lower bound for CONNECTED VERTEX COVER on d-degenerate graphs is already known).

Original languageEnglish
Article number43
JournalACM Transactions on Algorithms
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Degenerate graphs
  • Kernelization
  • Kernelization lower bounds
  • Parameterized complexity
  • Sparse graphs
  • Weak compositions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tight Kernel bounds for problems on graphs with small degeneracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this