Abstract
Dual process models of reasoning and thinking styles suggest that deliberative decision processes and profound evaluation lead people to better financial decisions. However, recent developments in decision-making research indicate that under certain conditions, a more automatic evaluation can lead to better decisions whereas further deliberative and thorough evaluation may lead to biased decisions. Here, we examined the nature of basic financial decision-making based on an intuitive, more automatic evaluation and characterize their advantages and disadvantages compared to a deliberative deep examination. By manipulating response time on an online questionnaire, participants were forced to make inferences and financial decisions under an intuitive or a deliberative mode of thought. Unexpectedly, the results show that in specific situations financial decisions were better under an intuitive mode of thought than a more analytical and deliberative style.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Behavioral Finance |
Subtitle of host publication | The Coming Of Age |
Publisher | World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd |
Pages | 37-56 |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9789813279469 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789813279452 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 18 Apr 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- General Business, Management and Accounting