TY - GEN
T1 - Tokenization Is More Than Compression
AU - Schmidt, Craig W.
AU - Reddy, Varshini
AU - Zhang, Haoran
AU - Alameddine, Alec
AU - Uzan, Omri
AU - Pinter, Yuval
AU - Tanner, Chris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Tokenization is a foundational step in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, bridging raw text and language models. Existing tokenization approaches like Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) originate from the field of data compression, and it has been suggested that the effectiveness of BPE stems from its ability to condense text into a relatively small number of tokens. We test the hypothesis that fewer tokens lead to better downstream performance by introducing PathPiece, a new tokenizer that segments a document's text into the minimum number of tokens for a given vocabulary. Through extensive experimentation we find this hypothesis not to be the case, casting doubt on the understanding of the reasons for effective tokenization. To examine which other factors play a role, we evaluate design decisions across all three phases of tokenization: pre-tokenization, vocabulary construction, and segmentation, offering new insights into the design of effective tokenizers. Specifically, we illustrate the importance of pre-tokenization and the benefits of using BPE to initialize vocabulary construction. We train 64 language models with varying tokenization, ranging in size from 350M to 2.4B parameters, all of which are made publicly available.
AB - Tokenization is a foundational step in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, bridging raw text and language models. Existing tokenization approaches like Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) originate from the field of data compression, and it has been suggested that the effectiveness of BPE stems from its ability to condense text into a relatively small number of tokens. We test the hypothesis that fewer tokens lead to better downstream performance by introducing PathPiece, a new tokenizer that segments a document's text into the minimum number of tokens for a given vocabulary. Through extensive experimentation we find this hypothesis not to be the case, casting doubt on the understanding of the reasons for effective tokenization. To examine which other factors play a role, we evaluate design decisions across all three phases of tokenization: pre-tokenization, vocabulary construction, and segmentation, offering new insights into the design of effective tokenizers. Specifically, we illustrate the importance of pre-tokenization and the benefits of using BPE to initialize vocabulary construction. We train 64 language models with varying tokenization, ranging in size from 350M to 2.4B parameters, all of which are made publicly available.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85213583536
U2 - 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.40
DO - 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.40
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85213583536
T3 - EMNLP 2024 - 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference
SP - 678
EP - 702
BT - EMNLP 2024 - 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference
A2 - Al-Onaizan, Yaser
A2 - Bansal, Mohit
A2 - Chen, Yun-Nung
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2024
Y2 - 12 November 2024 through 16 November 2024
ER -