TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a cross-sectoral view of nature-based solutions for enabling circular cities
AU - Langergraber, Guenter
AU - Castellar, Joana A.C.
AU - Andersen, Theis Raaschou
AU - Andreucci, Maria Beatrice
AU - Baganz, Gösta F.M.
AU - Buttiglieri, Gianluigi
AU - Canet-Martí, Alba
AU - Carvalho, Pedro N.
AU - Finger, David C.
AU - Griessler Bulc, Tjaša
AU - Junge, Ranka
AU - Megyesi, Boldizsár
AU - Milošević, Dragan
AU - Oral, Hasan Volkan
AU - Pearlmutter, David
AU - Pineda-Martos, Rocío
AU - Pucher, Bernhard
AU - van Hullebusch, Eric D.
AU - Atanasova, Nataša
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: The APC was funded by the COST Action CA17133 Circular City.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: This work was carried out within the COST Action CA17133 Circular City (“Implementing nature-based solutions for creating a resourceful circular city”, http://www.circular-city. eu, duration 22 October 2018–21 October 2022). COST Actions are funded within the EU Framework Programs for Research and Technological Development (currently: Horizon Europe). The authors are grateful for the support. G.B. acknowledges CTM2017-85385-C2-1-R from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR-1318), and funding from CERCA program/Generalitat de Catalunya. Additionally, the authors would like to acknowledge all participants of the Circular City workshops that contributed during the discussions to the development of the new framework.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - A framework developed by the COST Action Circular City (an EU-funded network of 500+ scientists from 40+ countries; COST = Cooperation in Science and Technology) for addressing Urban Circularity Challenges (UCCs) with nature-based solutions (NBSs) was analyzed by various urban sectors which refer to different fields of activities for circular management of resources in cities (i.e., reducing use of resources and production of waste). The urban sectors comprise the built environment, urban water management, resource recovery, and urban farming. We present main findings from sector analyses, discuss different sector perspectives, and show ways to overcome these differences. The results reveal the potential of NBSs to address multiple sectors, as well as multiple UCCs. While water has been identified as a key element when using NBSs in the urban environment, most NBSs are interconnected and also present secondary benefits for other resources. Using representative examples, we discuss how a holistic and systemic approach could facilitate the circular use of resources in cities. Currently, there is often a disciplinary focus on one resource when applying NBSs. The full potential of NBSs to address multifunctionality is, thus, usually not fully accounted for. On the basis of our results, we conclude that experts from various disciplines can engage in a cross-sectoral exchange and identify the full potential of NBSs to recover resources in circular cities and provide secondary benefits to improve the livelihood for locals. This is an important first step toward the full multifunctionality potential enabling of NBSs.
AB - A framework developed by the COST Action Circular City (an EU-funded network of 500+ scientists from 40+ countries; COST = Cooperation in Science and Technology) for addressing Urban Circularity Challenges (UCCs) with nature-based solutions (NBSs) was analyzed by various urban sectors which refer to different fields of activities for circular management of resources in cities (i.e., reducing use of resources and production of waste). The urban sectors comprise the built environment, urban water management, resource recovery, and urban farming. We present main findings from sector analyses, discuss different sector perspectives, and show ways to overcome these differences. The results reveal the potential of NBSs to address multiple sectors, as well as multiple UCCs. While water has been identified as a key element when using NBSs in the urban environment, most NBSs are interconnected and also present secondary benefits for other resources. Using representative examples, we discuss how a holistic and systemic approach could facilitate the circular use of resources in cities. Currently, there is often a disciplinary focus on one resource when applying NBSs. The full potential of NBSs to address multifunctionality is, thus, usually not fully accounted for. On the basis of our results, we conclude that experts from various disciplines can engage in a cross-sectoral exchange and identify the full potential of NBSs to recover resources in circular cities and provide secondary benefits to improve the livelihood for locals. This is an important first step toward the full multifunctionality potential enabling of NBSs.
KW - Circularity challenges
KW - Ecosystem-based management
KW - Interdisciplinary
KW - Multifunctionality
KW - Nature-based solutions
KW - Sustainable urban development
KW - Urban sectors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114108549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/w13172352
DO - 10.3390/w13172352
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114108549
SN - 2073-4441
VL - 13
JO - Water (Switzerland)
JF - Water (Switzerland)
IS - 17
M1 - 2352
ER -