Trade liberalization or oil shocks: Which better explains structural breaks in international trade ratios?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ben-David and Papell's (1997) tests for structural breaks in trade ratios over the postwar period revealed that trade ratios exhibited structural breaks in their paths and that postbreak trade averages exceeded prebreak averages. They attributed these breaks to trade liberalization measures carried out during this period. We re-evaluate their results and find that for most countries the averages of actual postbreak ratios were below the averages of the extrapolated prebreak ratios and that a large share of the breaks coincided with the 1970s oil shocks. This would suggest that the oil shocks rather than trade liberalization may account for the breaks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-264
Number of pages15
JournalReview of International Economics
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trade liberalization or oil shocks: Which better explains structural breaks in international trade ratios?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this