Transient Adverse Side Effects During Neurofeedback Training: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double Blind Study

Ainat Rogel, Jonathan Guez, Nir Getter, Eldad Keha, Tzlil Cohen, Tali Amor, Doron Todder

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    19 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The benefits of clinical neurofeedback training are well known, however, its adverse side-effects are less studied. This research focuses on the transient adverse side effects of neurofeedback training via a double-blind, sham/controlled methodology. Thirty healthy undergraduate students volunteers were randomly divided into three treatment groups: increasing a modified Sensory Motor Rhythm, increasing Upper Alpha, and Sham/control group who receive a random reward. The training sessions were administered for a total of ten sessions. Questionnaires of transient adverse side effects were completed by all volunteers before each session. The results suggest that similar to most medical treatments, neurofeedback can cause transient adverse side effects. Moreover, most participants reported experiencing some side effects. The side effects can be divided into non-specific side effect, associated with the neurofeedback training in general and specific ones associated with the particular protocol. Sensory Motor Rhythm protocol seems to be the most sensitive to side effects.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)209-218
    Number of pages10
    JournalApplied Psychophysiology Biofeedback
    Volume40
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 11 Sep 2015

    Keywords

    • Neurofeedback
    • SMR
    • Side effects
    • Upper Alpha

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
    • Applied Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Transient Adverse Side Effects During Neurofeedback Training: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double Blind Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this