TY - JOUR
T1 - Translocation t(11;14) in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
T2 - Is it always favorable?
AU - Leiba, Merav
AU - Duek, Adrian
AU - Amariglio, Ninette
AU - Avigdor, Abraham
AU - Benyamini, Noam
AU - Hardan, Izhar
AU - Zilbershats, Itay
AU - Ganzel, Chezi
AU - Shevetz, Olga
AU - Novikov, Ilya
AU - Cohen, Yossi
AU - Ishoev, Galina
AU - Rozic, Gabriela
AU - Nagler, Arnon
AU - Trakhtenbrot, Luba
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - The most common translocation in multiple myeloma (MM) is t(11;14)(q13;q32). According to several studies, this translocation represents a unique subset of patients with relatively favorable outcomes. Using combined analyses of morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), we examined the co-occurrence rates of t(11;14) with seven chromosomal aberrations (CAs), del(13q), del(17p), del(1p), gain(1q), multiple gains(1q), del(16q), and del(IGH), and assessed the effect of the different combinations on patient outcomes, with overall survival (OS) as the main outcome measure. Bone marrow samples and clinical data from 212 patients with MM with t(11;14) were analyzed. At least two additional CAs were found in 35% (75/205) of patients and a strong correlation between specific CAs. The occurrence of three CAs [multiple gains of (1q) (HR = 6.94, P = 0.001), del(1p) (HR = 4.47, P = 0.008), and del(IGH) (HR = 2.38, P = 0.002)] exerted a profoundly deleterious effect on median OS when compared with patients with t(11;14) only. Del(17p) and del(13q) have also exerted a deleterious effect albeit to a lesser extent (HR = 2.05, P = 0.07 and HR = 1.81, P = 0.03, respectively). When compared with t(11;14) alone, the addition of certain CAs lead to worse outcomes. These findings may have important clinical and biological implications. Patients with coexisting adverse lesions and t(11;14) may be considered at high risk and managed accordingly.
AB - The most common translocation in multiple myeloma (MM) is t(11;14)(q13;q32). According to several studies, this translocation represents a unique subset of patients with relatively favorable outcomes. Using combined analyses of morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), we examined the co-occurrence rates of t(11;14) with seven chromosomal aberrations (CAs), del(13q), del(17p), del(1p), gain(1q), multiple gains(1q), del(16q), and del(IGH), and assessed the effect of the different combinations on patient outcomes, with overall survival (OS) as the main outcome measure. Bone marrow samples and clinical data from 212 patients with MM with t(11;14) were analyzed. At least two additional CAs were found in 35% (75/205) of patients and a strong correlation between specific CAs. The occurrence of three CAs [multiple gains of (1q) (HR = 6.94, P = 0.001), del(1p) (HR = 4.47, P = 0.008), and del(IGH) (HR = 2.38, P = 0.002)] exerted a profoundly deleterious effect on median OS when compared with patients with t(11;14) only. Del(17p) and del(13q) have also exerted a deleterious effect albeit to a lesser extent (HR = 2.05, P = 0.07 and HR = 1.81, P = 0.03, respectively). When compared with t(11;14) alone, the addition of certain CAs lead to worse outcomes. These findings may have important clinical and biological implications. Patients with coexisting adverse lesions and t(11;14) may be considered at high risk and managed accordingly.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978043806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/gcc.22372
DO - 10.1002/gcc.22372
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84978043806
SN - 1045-2257
VL - 55
SP - 710
EP - 718
JO - Genes Chromosomes and Cancer
JF - Genes Chromosomes and Cancer
IS - 9
ER -