Traumatic glioblastoma: commentary and suggested mechanism

Nissim Ohana, Daniel Benharroch, Dimitri Sheinis, Abraham Cohen

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    5 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The role of head trauma in the development of glioblastoma is highly controversial and has been minimized since first put forward. This is not unexpected because skull injuries are overwhelmingly more common than glioblastoma. This paper presents a commentary based on the contributions of James Ewing, who established a major set of criteria for the recognition of an official relationship between trauma and cancer. Ewing’s criteria were very stringent. The scholars who succeeded Ewing have facilitated the characterization of traumatic brain injuries since the introduction of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Discussions of the various criteria that have since developed are now being conducted, and those of an unnecessarily limiting nature are being highlighted. Three transcription factors associated with traumatic brain injury have been identified: p53, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, and c-MYC. A role for these three transcription factors in the relationship between traumatic brain injury and glioblastoma is suggested; this role may support a cause-and-effect link with the subsequent development of glioblastoma.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2170-2176
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of International Medical Research
    Volume46
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jun 2018

    Keywords

    • Ewing’s criteria
    • glioblastoma
    • glioma
    • transcription factors
    • traumatic brain injury
    • Traumatic cancer

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Biochemistry
    • Cell Biology
    • Biochemistry, medical

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Traumatic glioblastoma: commentary and suggested mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this