Tunneling splitting energy vs. tunneling rate constant: An empirical computational corroboration

S. J. Rodríguez-Sotelo, S. Kozuch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Quantum tunneling in degenerate double-well molecular systems has two mutually exclusive observables: the delocalized, coherent energy splitting (ΔE01) and the localized, decoherent, non-stationary rearrangement rate constant (k). Although incompatible, both depend on similar factors, with sources suggesting linear or quadratic relationships. Our comparison between the experimental ΔE01 values and small-curvature tunneling computed k values supports the quadratic model. The agreement between experimental and computational results also supports the applied tunneling protocol. We discuss how the quadratic formula applies to the decoherent regime, typical in “chemical” tunneling, while the linear model describes quantum probability fluctuations between wells under coherent tunneling.

Original languageEnglish
Article number141890
JournalChemical Physics Letters
Volume864
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Computational quantum chemistry
  • Degenerate reaction
  • Quantum tunneling
  • Rate constant
  • Splitting energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Physics and Astronomy
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tunneling splitting energy vs. tunneling rate constant: An empirical computational corroboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this