Type-Restricted Argument Ellipsis and Generalized Quantifiers

Idan Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Theories of argument ellipsis based on PF deletion or LF copying do not generate predictions regarding possible constraints on the semantic type of the elided argument. Yet such constraints obtain, as documented in Landau 2022: only type- (Figure presented.) e (Figure presented.) arguments can be targeted by argument ellipsis. Focusing on quantificational arguments here, I show that when they yield readings expressible by type- (Figure presented.) e (Figure presented.) denotations, they may elide, but when they denote genuine generalized quantifiers, they may not. Utilizing the restricted range of interpretations made available by choice function binding and E-type pronouns, the analysis derives a number of peculiar scopal properties of indefinite NPs, quantifiers, and exceptive phrases under argument ellipsis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-129
Number of pages33
JournalLinguistic Inquiry
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • argument ellipsis
  • choice functions
  • exceptives
  • negative concord
  • quantification
  • semantic types
  • strong quantifiers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Type-Restricted Argument Ellipsis and Generalized Quantifiers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this