TY - JOUR
T1 - Uniform predation risk in nature
T2 - common, inconspicuous, and a source of error to predation risk experiments
AU - Menezes, Jorge F.S.
AU - Kotler, Burt P.
AU - Mourão, Guilherme M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Bernardo Araujo, Mauricio Silveira, and the thesis committee for comments on the manuscript and on the general numeric exploration; this work was supported by the Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research (EMBRAPA—PANTANAL) and by a National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) scholarship. We are also grateful for the comments of two anonymous reviewers about this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Previous studies indicate that when predation risk is uniform across habitats, foragers concentrate their exploitation in fewer patches. Although uniform predation risk may seem rare in nature, some scenarios might cause it. Testing all scenarios in a single experiment is unfeasible; therefore, we developed a model that points whether concentration of exploitation in specific habitats due to uniform risk requires parameter values similar to what is found in literature. This model was based on Brown’s (Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47, 1988) fitness function but rescaled to multiple habitats and predators, including uniform risk predators. Deriving function’s maximum allowed comparisons with giving-up density studies. Results showed that uniform predation risk had a u-shaped effect in habitat exploitation, causing a concentration of habitat exploitation at probabilities of survival from 0.2 to 0.8. However, the length of this interval and degree of concentration depended on the value of safety to forager fitness. Heterogeneous, nonuniform, predation risk decreases habitat exploitation where it was higher, therefore suppressing the effect of uniform risk on prey behavior. Time spent in the focal habitat and metabolic costs reduced the detectability of habitat concentration, while total time did not. We also found that uniform risk reduced accuracy of heterogeneous risk measurements. Future studies should aim to control all possible predators, as even the mild ones can induce complex behavior.
AB - Previous studies indicate that when predation risk is uniform across habitats, foragers concentrate their exploitation in fewer patches. Although uniform predation risk may seem rare in nature, some scenarios might cause it. Testing all scenarios in a single experiment is unfeasible; therefore, we developed a model that points whether concentration of exploitation in specific habitats due to uniform risk requires parameter values similar to what is found in literature. This model was based on Brown’s (Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47, 1988) fitness function but rescaled to multiple habitats and predators, including uniform risk predators. Deriving function’s maximum allowed comparisons with giving-up density studies. Results showed that uniform predation risk had a u-shaped effect in habitat exploitation, causing a concentration of habitat exploitation at probabilities of survival from 0.2 to 0.8. However, the length of this interval and degree of concentration depended on the value of safety to forager fitness. Heterogeneous, nonuniform, predation risk decreases habitat exploitation where it was higher, therefore suppressing the effect of uniform risk on prey behavior. Time spent in the focal habitat and metabolic costs reduced the detectability of habitat concentration, while total time did not. We also found that uniform risk reduced accuracy of heterogeneous risk measurements. Future studies should aim to control all possible predators, as even the mild ones can induce complex behavior.
KW - Giving-up density
KW - Habitat scale
KW - Multiple predators
KW - Quitting harvest rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027940264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00265-014-1790-z
DO - 10.1007/s00265-014-1790-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85027940264
SN - 0340-5443
VL - 68
SP - 1809
EP - 1818
JO - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
JF - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
IS - 11
ER -